Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC5F06229 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24438 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 22:53:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 23798 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 22:53:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 23618 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 22:53:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:53:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.46.98] (HELO indoqa.com) (88.198.46.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:53:43 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.112] (unknown [213.143.121.252]) by indoqa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5AE1A000D for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E0A5B62.9070808@apache.org> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:53:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Reinhard_P=F6tz?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [C3] Intra-pipeline calls References: <4E0834BA.7070901@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4E0834BA.7070901@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 06/27/2011 09:43 AM, Francesco Chicchiricc� wrote: > Hi all, > in these days I am working quite intensively in building an overalyable, > Cocoon 3 based, web application. > > Looking at the sample code, it seems that the only way to make > "intra-pipeline" calls is by using the servlet: protocol, hence the > Servlet service. > Is that correct? > > If so, would this mean that the cocoon-sample-wicket-webapp cannot make > intra-pipeline calls because the Servlet service (namely the > DispatcherServlet) is not in place - we have a catch-all Wicket-style > filter there? Unfortunately you are right. I also don't have a good solution on hand ATM ... -- Reinhard P�tz Founder & Managing Director, Indoqa and Deepsearch http://www.indoqa.com/people/reinhard-poetz.html Member of the Apache Software Foundation Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member reinhard@apache.org ________________________________________________________________________ Furthermore, I think Oracle has to honor the JSPA agreement. http://s.apache.org/JCPIsDead http://s.apache.org/tck-trap