cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cocoon 3.0.0-alpha-3
Date Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:47:32 GMT
Hi David!!!
thanks a lot for your review, I'll work on the problems you notified
before declaring the vote passed!
Thank once again, have a nice day!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:26 AM, David Crossley <crossley@apache.org> wrote:
> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> just to make sure everybody tests the same stuff, please refer to:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz*
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.zip*
>>
>> Include GPG key and checksum verification!!!
>
> Thanks Simone.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> MD5 (cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz) = 5b2e839101ec53246690b05dbf136b13
>
> There are a couple of things that should get fixed
> for next time:
>
> The md5 and sha1 files have extra "-n".
>
> All NOTICE.txt files have a year range, so needs 2011.
>
>
> I don't understand how Maven stuff works. There are some
> declared dependencies. They do use suitable licenses.
> Do we need to add a copy of their licenses in our distribution?
>
> e.g. some are:
> AspectJ : EPL-1.0
> Woodstox : Apache License 2.0
> Antlr : BSD
> MurmurHash : Apache License 2.0
>
> Some of those licenses do require reciprocity:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> e.g.
> We already have mentioned in NOTICE.txt the JAXB using CDDL.
>
> However we have not mentioned AspectJ using EPL.
>
> We do mention Java MurmurHash using AL-20 and the original
> using MIT, but we do not need to.
>
> -David
>
>

Mime
View raw message