cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cocoon 3.0.0-alpha-3
Date Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:21:26 GMT
Hi David,
OK, thanks! Anyway I re-uploaded the md5/sha1 files without the -n prefix :P
Thanks once again,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:56 AM, David Crossley <crossley@apache.org> wrote:
> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi David!!!
>> thanks a lot for your review, I'll work on the problems you notified
>> before declaring the vote passed!
>
> Well it does not need to be done at this stage if
> it receives sufficient votes.
>
> In my opinion these issue can wait until the next
> release cycle.
>
> -David
>
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> > Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> >> Hi again,
>> >> just to make sure everybody tests the same stuff, please refer to:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz*
>> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.zip*
>> >>
>> >> Include GPG key and checksum verification!!!
>> >
>> > Thanks Simone.
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> > MD5 (cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz) = 5b2e839101ec53246690b05dbf136b13
>> >
>> > There are a couple of things that should get fixed
>> > for next time:
>> >
>> > The md5 and sha1 files have extra "-n".
>> >
>> > All NOTICE.txt files have a year range, so needs 2011.
>> >
>> >
>> > I don't understand how Maven stuff works. There are some
>> > declared dependencies. They do use suitable licenses.
>> > Do we need to add a copy of their licenses in our distribution?
>> >
>> > e.g. some are:
>> > AspectJ : EPL-1.0
>> > Woodstox : Apache License 2.0
>> > Antlr : BSD
>> > MurmurHash : Apache License 2.0
>> >
>> > Some of those licenses do require reciprocity:
>> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>> > e.g.
>> > We already have mentioned in NOTICE.txt the JAXB using CDDL.
>> >
>> > However we have not mentioned AspectJ using EPL.
>> >
>> > We do mention Java MurmurHash using AL-20 and the original
>> > using MIT, but we do not need to.
>> >
>> > -David
>> >
>> >
>

Mime
View raw message