cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cocoon 3.0.0-alpha-3
Date Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:56:50 GMT
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi David!!!
> thanks a lot for your review, I'll work on the problems you notified
> before declaring the vote passed!

Well it does not need to be done at this stage if
it receives sufficient votes.

In my opinion these issue can wait until the next
release cycle.

-David

> David Crossley wrote:
> > Simone Tripodi wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >> just to make sure everybody tests the same stuff, please refer to:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz*
> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.zip*
> >>
> >> Include GPG key and checksum verification!!!
> >
> > Thanks Simone.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > MD5 (cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz) = 5b2e839101ec53246690b05dbf136b13
> >
> > There are a couple of things that should get fixed
> > for next time:
> >
> > The md5 and sha1 files have extra "-n".
> >
> > All NOTICE.txt files have a year range, so needs 2011.
> >
> >
> > I don't understand how Maven stuff works. There are some
> > declared dependencies. They do use suitable licenses.
> > Do we need to add a copy of their licenses in our distribution?
> >
> > e.g. some are:
> > AspectJ : EPL-1.0
> > Woodstox : Apache License 2.0
> > Antlr : BSD
> > MurmurHash : Apache License 2.0
> >
> > Some of those licenses do require reciprocity:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> > e.g.
> > We already have mentioned in NOTICE.txt the JAXB using CDDL.
> >
> > However we have not mentioned AspectJ using EPL.
> >
> > We do mention Java MurmurHash using AL-20 and the original
> > using MIT, but we do not need to.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message