Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58014 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2009 13:03:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2009 13:03:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19923 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2009 13:03:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 19854 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2009 13:03:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 19662 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2009 13:03:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:03:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of thorsten.scherler.ext@juntadeandalucia.es designates 217.12.18.114 as permitted sender) Received: from [217.12.18.114] (HELO mta.juntadeandalucia.es) (217.12.18.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:03:04 +0000 Received: from [10.240.225.254] (helo=mail.juntadeandalucia.es) by guadix1.juntadeandalucia.es with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LSt19-000810-Or; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:02:43 +0100 Received: from [10.240.192.30] by mail.juntadeandalucia.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LSt19-0006UX-CO; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:02:43 +0100 Subject: Reasons for perfomance decline - ideas wanted From: Thorsten Scherler To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Cc: "dev@forrest" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:05:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1233320711.7002.22.camel@eric> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -99 X-Spam-Score-Int: -99 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I am trying to find out why one of my projects suffer perfomance declines. I opened an issue around the problem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1157 and added some testing file to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/branches/dispatcher_rewrite/FOR-11= 57 Both wars are basically the same but have some minor difference, mainly the dispatcher library and its dependencies. However I debugged both versions and tested with different tests. The most important match I am debugging is the following: =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 In one test I cut the pipeline after the generator (1) and the result is surprising. Since there is NO difference between the old and new version in the generator I was awaiting that the performance should be the same. But 55,5 (new) vs. 64,5 (old) are not even close to be the same. I do not see any reason for performance penalty since I am not actually testing my development but a general component that did not changed at all. Has anybody an idea what the reason for the performance decline can be? salu2 --=20 Thorsten Scherler Open Source Java Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad=20 de la Informaci=C3=B3n, S.A.U. (SADESI)