cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grzegorz Kossakowski <g...@tuffmail.com>
Subject Re: [c3] Pipeline results
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:08:33 GMT
Peter Hunsberger pisze:
> 
> I guess part of the debate is whether it is worth defining some
> additional method, eg:
> 
>   CocoonOutput execute( CocoonInput genericInput) throws ?;
> 
> or
> 
>   Object execute( Object genericInput) throws ?;
> 
> I really can't see that the CocoonOuput and CocoonInput are anything
> more than marker interfaces and this of course means that more
> standard objects have to be wrapped so I think the  second  version is
> preferable.  But that certainly doesn't buy you anything as far as
> pipeline contracts are concerned for traditional Java.  However, I do
> think that perhaps this opens up some longer term possibilities for
> Aspect oriented inspection across the pipeline so maybe it is actually
> worth adding?

You have got a point, it's exactly about this. The problem is (that my code shows) that this
kind of thing, looking
simple at the beginning results in rather ugly constructs in Java... At least I couldn't make
it more concise...

-- 
Best regards,
Grzegorz Kossakowski

Mime
View raw message