Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90010 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2008 02:06:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2008 02:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 91764 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2008 02:06:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 91680 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2008 02:06:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 91669 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2008 02:06:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:06:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.230.240.47] (HELO eastrmmtao105.cox.net) (68.230.240.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:05:25 +0000 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080805020450.BJLX18077.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:04:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([72.205.34.46]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id yS4q1Z00D0zjV5C02S4qGq; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:04:50 -0400 Message-Id: From: Vadim Gritsenko To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <48975221.5080805@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: A new name for Corona (take 2) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:04:50 -0400 References: <4895CC7D.80406@dslextreme.com> <48963071.2040107@apache.org> <489655B3.6000706@dslextreme.com> <48969B55.3010205@apache.org> <4896A080.90806@apache.org> <4897071A.9020507@apache.org> <48970847.9020508@apache.org> <48970D1E.1090304@apache.org> <48971258.203@apache.org> <48972727.2020005@apache.org> <48975221.5080805@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > solprovider@apache.org wrote: >> Pick a number that will never be production for the experimental >> branch e.g. 2.7. Skip a few numbers in case trunk needs another >> minor >> number (e.g. 2.3 and 2.4) and to avoid confusion that this branch is >> not the immediate successor to 2.2. Do not use 2.9 in case a >> non-Corona pre-release branch is needed before 3.0. >> A number both distinguishes code compatibility and suggests the >> position in history better than a code name such as x. >> "cocoon-2.7-pipeline" is obviously not compatible with Cocoon-2.2 or >> Cocoon-3.0. This also handles all possible futures: >> - The number suggests that the code becomes obsolete after 3.0 is >> released if the branch becomes 3.0 or is abandoned; >> cocoon-x-pipeline-1.0 does not. >> - The branch could become NewName-1.0 if the projects split. >> The Lenya project did this twice: >> - Production 1.2 branched to 1.4 for development of 2.0. >> - An experimental branch based on 1.2 incompatible with 1.4 was >> named 1.3. >> > This sounds to me as the most pragmatic and simplest solution. > > We could start with version 2.7 Too complicated / confusing. I'd rather have us use 3.0, and if that does not work out, we can skip that and start 4.0. It worked fine for Tomcat, can work for us too. Vadim