Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-100193-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65850 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 14:52:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 14:52:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 85225 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 14:52:51 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85137 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 14:52:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85126 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 14:52:50 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:52:50 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:52:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 65625 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 14:52:30 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO bslm-027.corp.day.com) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 14:52:30 -0000
Message-ID: <4899BAAB.3020705@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:52:27 +0200
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; de;
 rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080707 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16
 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is it necessary to increase the development version number
 (SNAPSHOT)
 after a release?
References: <20080805194246.7A0FB23889FF@eris.apache.org>
 <48994C8B.3090607@tuffmail.com> <4899561D.6030201@apache.org>
 <4899B8CC.9040708@dslextreme.com>
In-Reply-To: <4899B8CC.9040708@dslextreme.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Ralph Goers wrote
> I'm actually working on a fix to maven for this at the moment. It would 
> allow you to put <version>MAVEN_PARENT_VERSION</version> in the pom 
> instead of an actual version number. Don't get your hopes up though. 
> I've been working on this for the last few weeks in the precious little 
> available time I have right now. The thing that makes it difficult is 
> that when your pom gets installed or deployed it has to have a real 
> version number in it.
And how does this work, if you just check out a single module instead of 
the whole tree?

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org