cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <>
Subject Re: A new name for Corona (take 2)
Date Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:17:35 GMT
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>> You guys have finally convinced me. Let's use 3.0.x for Corona, 
>> clearly state that it is alpha software on the website in the 
>> README.txt of each release artifact and see what's happening.
>> Then we only need to find a package name that isn't used in trunk 
>> because Corona should run in parallel with Cocoon 2.2 without a 
>> problem (haven't tried it yet but at least in theory).
>> The simplest solution would be keeping 'corona' as part of the package 
>> name (org.apache.cocoon.corona). IIRC Tomcat also kept the 'catalina' 
>> package names.
>> Any other suggestions?
> I forgot to mention that we also have to find unique Maven artifact IDs 
> for the reasons explained above.
Great, I'm fine with using 3.0.x as well.

For the package names and artifact ids, I'm not sure if we should keep 
corona inside. I would prefer to simply use different functional package 
names. And if we use the package names as group ids, we're fine.

Carsten Ziegeler

View raw message