cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Pruy <Rainer.P...@Acrys.COM>
Subject Re: Find a new name for Corona
Date Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:10:07 GMT
Just my 0,02 cents...

I always considered "Cocoon" to mean more than pipelines, sitemap and alike....
Thus I don't think using Cocoon 3.0 being an apropriate name.

What about

Cocoon Pipe  (ok, not exaktly)

or

Cocoon Bones

Rainer

Reinhard Pötz schrieb:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Reinhard Pötz <reinhard@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> :-( that's bad. Any other suggestions?
>>
>> I still think that Cocoon 3.0 could be the name, if people are going
>> to invest a significant effort in what's Corona today. For Sling we'd
>> like to use the pipelines implementation, so some of us Sling folks
>> are planning to contribute and help maintain that. I am not interested
>> in the other parts at the moment.
>>
>> We already have 2.1 and 2.2 which are fairly different products,
>> Cocoon 3.0 would be a lightweight embeddable thing that captures the
>> essence of Cocoon in a way that's better suited to many of today's
>> environments. Clearly an evolution, even though some parts will be
>> missing, as those new environments provide them.
> 
> I'm still not convinced that we should name it Cocoon 3.0 _now_ (quoting
> myself from a few days ago):
> 
> [...] Before we make the decision if Corona should become Cocoon 3.0 we
> should learn more what other people think about it. (Currently it's only
> 3 people who use it!) IMO the best way to find this out is by shipping
> alpha releases under a codename. This gives us the freedom to decide
> later without spoiling version numbers. [...]
> 
> When Corona is able to attract a stable community proves itself useable
> to a wider audience, we can start to ship it as Cocoon 3.0.
> 
> Or is it only me who needs to be convinced of shipping Corona as Cocoon
> 3.0?
> 

Mime
View raw message