cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Atherton <>
Subject Re: Layered software designs
Date Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:41:31 GMT
I'm with you, too.

Just as an example, I think it might be useful to use Corona as the 
basis for a new Ant task called Pipeline. That task could do any number 
text transformations to a set of files as part of a build process. Here, 
caching is a non-issue for the most part since the point of using a 
pipeline would be to process each file only once. Rather than either or SourceResolve, we'd probably want to feed the pipeline 
based on Ant resources[1], just as the existing XSLT task is fed.

It may be that SourceResolver and an AntResourceSource is the best way 
to solve the problem, but on a cursory glance it sure looks like it is 
difficult to separate the banana from the gorilla[2] that is Avalon.


Torsten Curdt wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 14:44, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>>  Pipeline API  +   +  XML-SAX components
>>> A more advanced scenario could consist of
>>>  Pipeline API  +  Sourceresolve  +  XML-SAX components  +  Sitemap 
>>> Engine
>>> or maybe you need the full stack that corresponds to Cocoon Core 2.2 
>>> - here you are:
>>>  Pipeline API  +  Sourceresolve  +  HTTP-enabled  +  Sitemap Engine  
>>> +  Spring
>>>                                       XML-SAX
>>>                                     componnents
>>> This layered approach makes Cocoon easily embeddable in any Java 
>>> application and Cocoon's learning curve becomes more gradual.
>>> Is such a situation only appealing to Carsten, Steven and me?
> Just lurking but I am with you guys.
>> Appealing? yes.  Actually implementable in Java so that it isn;t even 
>> more complicated than what we have? I don't know.
> IMO this would simplify a lot as it separates concerns and the inner 
> guts can be used in other projects without the pain of dependencies we 
> have right now. People have been asking for this for years. I really 
> think think this is the right direction.
> cheers
> -- 
> Torsten

View raw message