Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of joerg.heinicke@gmx.de
 designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <47A932E4.3070201@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:09:08 -0500
From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [off-topic] Index path in patch files from Subclipse
References: <45C9A720.1070505@tuffmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <45C9A720.1070505@tuffmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07.02.2007 05:17, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:

> It's little bit off-topic but my question is related to my patches I've
> recently sent on JIRA. I've seen that all my patches produced by
> Subclipse contain absolute path of Index: field. I think it's not
> desired and these patches will cause problems to the others. Could
> someone using Subclipse confirm this situation? Or maybe someone knows
> how to fix that?

Just stumbled about this old mail in my unread mail and wanted to answer 
it for the archives before it becomes one year old :)

The absolute paths are not a problem. When applying a patch you can 
specify the number of leading path segments to ignore - at least with 
Subclipse.

But you probably know this yourself after having worked so much with 
patch files ;)

Joerg