Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
In-Reply-To: <47B70B5C.20107@apache.org>
References: <47B70B5C.20107@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <301CB0A5-729D-4947-B529-B7881FB561D5@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Torsten Curdt <tcurdt@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:44:37 +0100
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org


On 16.02.2008, at 17:12, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

>
> After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl'  
> means, I propose to change it to some better name.
>
> The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application  
> which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web  
> application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage  
> of the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it  
> 'cocoon:rcl'.
>
> I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I  
> think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing.  
> If we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut  
> 'cocoon:wb'.

"wrap-block" ??? Hm ...I cannot really see how that is much better -  
sorry ;)

What about "cocoon:webapp-loader"

cheers
--
Torsten