From dev-return-98409-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Wed Feb 06 06:41:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22821 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2008 06:41:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 06:41:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 93098 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 06:41:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 93039 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 06:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 93028 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2008 06:41:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:41:05 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of grek@tuffmail.com designates 216.86.168.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.86.168.179] (HELO mxout-04.mxes.net) (216.86.168.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:40:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.12.48] (unknown [83.65.231.4]) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2331DD05B3 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:40:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47A9564C.4000006@tuffmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:40:12 +0100 From: Grzegorz Kossakowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [off-topic] Index path in patch files from Subclipse References: <45C9A720.1070505@tuffmail.com> <47A932E4.3070201@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <47A932E4.3070201@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joerg Heinicke pisze: > On 07.02.2007 05:17, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: > >> It's little bit off-topic but my question is related to my patches I've >> recently sent on JIRA. I've seen that all my patches produced by >> Subclipse contain absolute path of Index: field. I think it's not >> desired and these patches will cause problems to the others. Could >> someone using Subclipse confirm this situation? Or maybe someone knows >> how to fix that? > > Just stumbled about this old mail in my unread mail and wanted to answer > it for the archives before it becomes one year old :) LOL! :D > The absolute paths are not a problem. When applying a patch you can > specify the number of leading path segments to ignore - at least with > Subclipse. > > But you probably know this yourself after having worked so much with > patch files ;) Yes, I know this. Nevertheless, thanks Joerg for your answer. ;) Best regards from Vienna! :) Grzegorz