Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43133 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2008 08:06:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2008 08:06:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 68761 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2008 08:05:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68691 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2008 08:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68680 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2008 08:05:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:05:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:05:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 42861 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2008 08:05:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO carsten-ziegelers-computer.local) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jan 2008 08:05:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4785D1D8.5010905@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:05:44 +0100 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1.11 Released References: <478505B8.9010605@apache.org> <4785C9A9.3060904@dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <4785C9A9.3060904@dslextreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks Carsten. > > I don't get the last paragraph though. Why would we provide more > information about 2.1.10 when the announcement is for 2.1.11? The > changes.html link has almost nothing under 2.1.11 so I assume the > reference to 2.1.10 is correct? > No, that's a typo - the announcement is hand prepared and I oversaw the version number at the bottom. For the changes.html I have no idea how to update them. If someone could have a look at it, would be great! Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziegeler@apache.org