Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88385 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2008 23:04:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2008 23:04:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 88819 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2008 23:04:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88744 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2008 23:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88732 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2008 23:04:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:04:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.133.51.241] (HELO mail.hippo.nl) (213.133.51.241) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:04:33 +0000 Received: from 84.104.196.220 ([84.104.196.220]) by hai02.hippointern.lan ([10.10.100.26]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:04:26 +0000 Received: from hal09 by webmail.hippo.nl; 08 Jan 2008 00:04:26 +0100 Subject: Re: [Vote] Cocoon Release 2.1.11 From: Jeroen Reijn Reply-To: j.reijn@hippo.nl To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <478244D2.5090702@agssa.net> References: <4778B92D.7000608@apache.org> <4781F512.307@minick.ch> <478244D2.5090702@agssa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: Hippo Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:04:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1199747066.23677.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was not able to test it with the CMS today, but on both my Ubuntu laptop with JDK 1.5 and on my desktop WinXP JDK 1.4 all seems fine! +1 Jeroen On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:27 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Hi Alec, >=20 > This is a great improvement! However, we cannot use a newer ehcache=20 > version, cuz we must keep cocoon 2.1.x branch compatible with java 1.3. := S >=20 > Currently, we use ehcache 1.2.3. The 1.2.4 did drop support for java 1.3 = [1] >=20 > Best Regards, >=20 > Antonio Gallardo. >=20 > [1] http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html#1.2.4RC >=20 >=20 > Alec Bickerton escribi=C3=B3: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > =20 > >> Hi, > >> > >> i've put up the 2.1.11 release at: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/cocoon/ > >> =20 > > > > I'm just looking through JIRA and note that the version still uses an > > antiquated version of ehcache. By that I mean, a version that does not > > do large distributed caching properly. Large caches must be recreated o= n > > server restart and fall over when distributed caching is attempted. > > > > Simply replacing the ehcache.jar is not a clean solution as ehcache wil= l > > write all its files to java.io.tmpdir and produce many warnings > > whenever used. > > > > This is an open issue for C2.2, so I feel it would be something that > > needs to be looked at before a final release. > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > I'm still finding my way around the cocoon codebase and may be missing > > something obvious to the old hands. :-) > > > > Regards, > > Alec. > > =20 >=20