Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32492 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2007 15:06:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2007 15:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 29829 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2007 15:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29770 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2007 15:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29759 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2007 15:06:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:06:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bdelacretaz@gmail.com designates 72.14.202.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.202.177] (HELO ro-out-1112.google.com) (72.14.202.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:05:59 +0000 Received: by ro-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id h4so256653roe for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:05:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=YJyJg5CSSxWdFA87RgJkcMVjxmwjpi2rWPZtSd8nV58=; b=sFzp+oFx+MWpN9CsnvxHqOkDzoT1X4kCX40Em+TMWJJttW05skFQDt3TSQQJcGNSoSmmpNdruhdGCW2WBkcT/NZfKXejFMwaAOjalDAdMHx/2lESC9cgpj02+3RuZobnMp/Z47znqo8hTtnTn87y7QvFZJTNqxVjplKpSc8fOJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fIsR1jdmVHuE0Q/hF9Ej3yc1N8fst61jRQhxomTFfRmbAfYFf18K054oR/1uDh4lTCHnUDKbt4O1bFV4k5DBQn2Od0TdFAuPNgvJHRs2Mpse7jqMpOgXjFt2YhcYRLu+uQkjx6sdUNyfatKly44YrfBR1HpqU8DahifhAsgS/nI= Received: by 10.114.89.1 with SMTP id m1mr779626wab.1195138264928; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.193.11 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:50:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:50:59 -0500 From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" Sender: bdelacretaz@gmail.com To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: lenya 2.0 release preparation - cocoon version dependency (2.1.11?) In-Reply-To: <473C5AB5.1070402@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <473C5AB5.1070402@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c61ea8e8ceab05ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 15, 2007 9:41 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > ...I think it makes > sense to do a 2.1.11 release as a maintenance release, especially if > Lenya wants to use this version. However, the only problem I see right > now is the question of the qualitify. Which means, how many people are > using latest svn and/or have tested it?... If Lenya is using it successfully, and if our automated tests pass (I can run them on Linux and MacOSX when the time comes) I'd be ok with making a release. There have been some small changes since 2.1.10, and little is happening in the 2.1 branch, so it might be good to do a release of that. -Bertrand