Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49933 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2007 04:42:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2007 04:42:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 69476 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 04:42:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69392 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 04:42:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69381 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2007 04:42:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:42:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.51.199.94] (HELO mail9.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.94) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:44:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 24463 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2007 04:41:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (66.51.196.164) by mail9.dslextreme.com with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:41:39 -0700 Message-ID: <46F1FA2A.7050402@dslextreme.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:42:18 -0700 From: Ralph Goers Reply-To: rgoers@apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Code freeze? References: <46EF87E1.5050308@tuffmail.com> <46EFA989.6000107@apache.org> <46EFB1C6.3070600@apache.org> <46EFBA63.2050805@apache.org> <46F0606E.3020007@gmx.de> <46F0CBE5.9050702@apache.org> <46F1153B.7050103@gmx.de> <46F1411C.2000006@nada.kth.se> <46F1E5B8.502@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <46F1E5B8.502@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 19.09.2007 11:32 Uhr, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > >> While we have a historical tradition of using 2 slashes, but it is >> wrong according to the URL standard >> (http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html). 1 or 3 slashes is >> correct. No idea about how we should handle this fact though ;) > > Ok, for Windows it might make sense considering the drives as > authority part: file://C:/temp/file.tmp. Maybe we should talk about > the actual task of this method. Is it about wiping out differences of > the os what I thought so far? Or do we go with the os differences. > Then maybe the test must be more relaxed. I don't think so. The way I read it C would be a host name a the ":" would be invalid because it is required to be followed by a port. http://www.mozilla.org/quality/networking/testing/filetests.html has a bunch of examples. http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/12/06/file-uris-in-windows.aspx documents what was done in IE 7. Of course, I always solve this by using cygwin on Windows... Ralph