Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46CA787A.2080207@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:30:34 -0700
From: Ralph Goers <Ralph.Goers@dslextreme.com>
Reply-To: rgoers@apache.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Division of Cocoon's JIRA project
References: <46C2EB83.9060105@tuffmail.com> <46C2EF27.5020305@apache.org>
 <46C2FD9D.7020602@apache.org> <46C47F7A.7010409@apache.org>
 <46C48C2D.4090004@gmx.net> <46C48D7D.5080900@gmx.net>
 <46C49644.9070605@apache.org> <46C71646.4060700@reverycodes.com>
 <46C71B5B.1020306@apache.org> <46C9E17D.9040309@reverycodes.com>
 <46C9E6B5.4000700@apache.org> <46CA729E.6040609@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <46CA729E.6040609@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> On 20.08.2007 15:08 Uhr, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
>
>> I really wouldn't like to be seen as crazy person blindly pushing us 
>> to this split up. To be honest, I would like to do nothing. Such 
>> split up is lots of work in JIRA itself, then fixing URLs in our 
>> poms, etc. My goal is simple: let our issue tracking have valid 
>> information about version particular issue affects and version where 
>> particular issue is fixed.
>
> You are not the only person. I'd prefer a better solution as well, but 
> I change the camp since it does not seem to be worth the effort at the 
> moment. You only move the problem from selecting the right version to 
> selecting the right Jira project - and therefore break all the URLs. 
> Some like issues linked in Jira comments themselves you can't even fix.
>
> I think in the meantime we should just leave it as is and hope for 
> improvements in Jira itself like versions specific to components and 
> not only projects.
>
> WDYT?
+1

Ralph