Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24882 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2007 14:39:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2007 14:39:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 15206 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2007 14:39:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15114 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2007 14:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15103 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2007 14:39:44 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:39:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.46.98] (HELO indoqa.com) (88.198.46.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:39:40 -0700 Received: from [10.4.1.249] (unknown [86.59.20.138]) by indoqa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FD6254060 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:47:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46827696.3010505@apache.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:39:18 +0200 From: Reinhard Poetz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [vote] Releasing from trunk: Cocoon 2.2-RC1 & others (take 2) References: <467BE32B.7030208@apache.org> <46826AF9.2060807@reverycodes.com> In-Reply-To: <46826AF9.2060807@reverycodes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > cocoon-core-2.2.0-RC1-tests.jar and > cocoon-pipeline-impl-1.0.0-RC1-tests.jar have no required LICENSE, > NOTICE files. *argh* > cocoon-4.pom file has no license header. I guess it got lost after the first release :-( > All of maven-metadata.xml files have no license header either. Do we really have to add our license header to those files? AFAICS nobody does it. Do they really contain (enough) protectable intellectual property? I don't think so. - o - Anyway, I have to release cocoon-4, cocoon-core-2.2.0-RC1-tests and cocoon-pipeline-impl-1.0.0-RC1-tests again. Since all other modules depend on them, this stops the release of all other artifacts too :-( The problem is that a) I'm not sure how to add LICENSE and NOTICE to the _old_ code. I guess I have to create branches of those modules first, add the files there and run mvn release again. b) I don't have much time for opensource stuff ATM hence I can't say when I can do it. Sorry. If somebody has more time for the release of the three artifacts, just let me know ... -- Reinhard P�tz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach {Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon} web(log): http://www.poetz.cc --------------------------------------------------------------------