Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93634 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2007 17:34:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2007 17:34:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 78716 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 17:34:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 78450 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 17:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 78438 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2007 17:34:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:34:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ap-cocoon-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:34:07 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HeE25-00038T-0D for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:33:29 +0200 Received: from d5153ca7c.access.telenet.be ([81.83.202.124]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:33:28 +0200 Received: from jheymans by d5153ca7c.access.telenet.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:33:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@cocoon.apache.org From: Jorg Heymans Subject: Re: 2.2 failing to build: cocoon-javaflow Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:33:51 +0200 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <11641E74-7ADB-4D99-A86C-43823CC3A712@luminas.co.uk> <4623588F.30309@apache.org> <859F9128-A1BD-46E3-92BE-17828A37039F@luminas.co.uk> <4623D5CB.5060402@apache.org> <4624D8DA.30804@apache.org> <46252676.5050301@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: d5153ca7c.access.telenet.be User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) In-Reply-To: <46252676.5050301@gmx.de> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joerg Heinicke wrote: >>> Eeeeh, I hope not! I'd worry about the health of the overall codebase if >>> no-one else is building allblocks! Is this why continuum is not failing >>> when it should be? ... > > I can only agree with Andrew. The goal has to be that all blocks are > working and continuum runs all blocks. That's orthogonal to independent > release cycles and community interest. As long it the blocks are in > Cocoon's codebase we have to care for them. FWIW continuum hasn't been running for a good few weeks now. I disabled it around the time of Reinhard's POM refactorings and never got around reinstalling it. The suggestion at the time was to let CI do a top-level build with -Pallblocks , instead of having it parse the pom and build each block separately. I believe Giacomo had a setup like this for his project. Regards, Jorg