Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23610 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 11:19:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 11:19:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 76527 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 11:19:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 76468 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 11:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 76457 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2007 11:19:30 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:19:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.133.33.40] (HELO smtp.is.nl) (213.133.33.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:19:22 -0700 Received: from [213.133.51.241] (HELO hai01.hippo.local) by smtp.is.nl (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.10) with ESMTP id 13001560 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:11 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: StoreJanitor (was: Re: Moving reduced version of CachingSource to core | Configuration issues) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:19:00 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: StoreJanitor (was: Re: Moving reduced version of CachingSource to core | Configuration issues) Thread-Index: Acd1CI8EwL9G+mF/TDmVgokR63X61AAyyVGgAANX/NA= From: "Ard Schrijvers" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ?? my mail got sended by accident :S....finishing it now > be implemented quite easily, but might take long start up times) > 6) JCSCache has a complex configuration IMO. Therefor, I=20 > added default configurations to choose from, for example: =20 =20 where size might be small, medium, large or huge.=20 I think we have created with in this way a setup for cocoon, where it is = harder for unexperienced users to have memory problems when trying to = implement larger sites.=20 Hopefully somebody read my mail until here :-) I am curious about what = others think, Ard