Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44389 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2007 13:00:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2007 13:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31935 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2007 13:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 31851 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2007 13:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 31839 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2007 13:00:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 06:00:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.86.168.178] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (216.86.168.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 06:00:25 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [87.206.142.101]) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804735197B for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <462A0AB4.10805@apache.org> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:59:32 +0200 From: Grzegorz Kossakowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Broken caching of servlet: source in some cases References: <20070419132805.E1FD41A9838@eris.apache.org> <4627708D.6080104@apache.org> <46277664.2030200@apache.org> <4628A094.9080001@apache.org> <4628C4A7.9020102@apache.org> <4628F8A9.5060704@apache.org> <46290D38.8050901@apache.org> <4629F48B.1010506@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4629F48B.1010506@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Grzegorz Kossakowski napisał(a): > > You are right, thanks for keeping eye on that. > I've talked with Reinhard about this issue and we agreed that old Last-Modified is needed when validity is returned. We'll have to maintain > our own store with these values. > I'm working on the definitive solution to this problem. > Done. Could you give it a try? Changes are described in comments of source code and svn log. -- Grzegorz Kossakowski http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/