Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79685 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2006 14:36:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2006 14:36:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 29914 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2006 14:36:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29850 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2006 14:36:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29823 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2006 14:36:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:36:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of peter.hunsberger@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.238] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:35:57 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so1371451wxd for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:35:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JT1cjP0pkMC8mzEZ7aooMcg8T+YTTqdM6eFK2GIJLD/PC7Wm5Be0xt8ZHHqLfV/5d+bbDi3tnGmtsl+JrWQuy7VbK3MyQaUdKOqWj/mRJOm/014UKo/qvM9E05QMKQ6r67UARWHBb/353344qESxYZqa+2ulFn6wHiFumg+LAjM= Received: by 10.70.117.1 with SMTP id p1mr7549954wxc.1166452537061; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.19.15 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:35:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:35:36 -0600 From: "Peter Hunsberger" To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Drop JDK1.3 support after 2.1.10 release In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1166054138.5794.30.camel@localhost> <200612181205.40717.niclas@hedhman.org> <458650A8.7080209@dslextreme.com> <458682BD.20404@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/18/06, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On 12/18/06, hepabolu wrote: > > > ...- rename the current branch to Cocoon 2.2 without the 1.3 compatibility.. > > Not 2.2, please...we've been talking about 2.2 for so long that > releasing the 2.1 branch as 2.2 might be very confusing. > > I'm not against renumbering things, no problem with that. But "Cocoon > 2.2" means our current trunk for many people, and IMHO we shouldn't > reuse that version number for anything else. I'd disagree; the current numbering scheme seems completely arbitrary and doesn't help clarify the major differences between 2.1 and 2.2. Yes there are users on the dev list, but I'd bet every single person that has actually downloaded Trunk and built it can cope with having it called 3.0 instead of 2.2. -- Peter Hunsberger