cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antonio Gallardo <anto...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-1970) JavaFlow OJB sample overwrites first entry on insert
Date Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:08:40 GMT
Justin Mason escribió:
> Jeff Turner writes:
>   
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:20:04PM +0100, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this relatively new feature of adding comments to Jira issues by 
>>> replying to its mails has one caveat: autoreplies like this absent 
>>> message get added to Jira as well like you can see here:
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1969
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1970
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility to prevent this?
>>>       
>> The majority of autoreplies are caught by a procmail rule, but these ones
>> are generated by Outlook Express directly, and have absolutely nothing in
>> the headers indicating they are autoreplies.
>>
>> I'll block replies from cticorporativo@fibertel.com.ar and let them know
>> to configure their clients a bit better.
>>     
>
> Interesting -- they've been autoreplying to all posts on the SpamAssassin
> users list, too, and SVN commits on our dev list.   Are they subscribed
> to every Apache list there is, or something?
>   

I did not read this mail previously, call me paranoid, but I suspect 
this is a spammer, trying to understand how jira works, ie: in case the 
mailbox of the user does not exists anymore. The message on the autmatic 
reply mail says the mailbox was deactivated. Given the foot print of the 
intented address I wonder what an account manager from a shopping center 
do here. :)

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.


Mime
View raw message