Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41216 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2006 02:46:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2006 02:46:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 68223 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2006 02:46:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68162 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2006 02:46:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68151 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2006 02:46:49 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:46:49 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.230.240.34] (HELO eastrmmtao05.cox.net) (68.230.240.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:46:35 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061111024618.CACG18065.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:46:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.179.64.83]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id lElc1V00F1nmRs60000000; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:45:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4555395F.1030409@reverycodes.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:45:51 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Shielded classloading References: <454BC0C8.6010204@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <454BC0C8.6010204@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes > and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs. Looks OK to me. Wouldn't WEB-INF/shielded/classes and WEB-INF/shielded/libs be slightly better? Anyway, +1. Vadim