Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73653 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2006 06:18:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2006 06:18:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3891 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 06:18:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 3805 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 06:18:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 3793 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2006 06:18:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:18:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of bdelacretaz@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.179] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:18:54 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c59so2651047pyc for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=J0EaknuklH69+v+Xf7yanxGO7oNzOkR//TFDnII8ho+QYAr5iXgp3LGVdvF+jr06zW0w8FNaMh7LJRiOhOnxW1Httz6sHrl5X7cSMpXvO3Y7RR2WAU+Rjp0FHrbht/eSvQn5MVnBUYCd8qU0gIoIcA1EkVEHLILHCbMl8sWNUrI= Received: by 10.64.241.3 with SMTP id o3mr11058578qbh; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.215.3 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:18:33 +0200 From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" Sender: bdelacretaz@gmail.com To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] Cocoon 2.2 and java 1.5 revisited. In-Reply-To: <452AB92D.7010001@agssa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4529C9AC.60600@agssa.net> <452A7F44.3020300@agssa.net> <452AB92D.7010001@agssa.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 38693f674bf7b5c0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/9/06, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > ...Because we claim 2.1 is java 1.3 when it > fact few of us care about this compatibility and some blocks does not > compile at all.... I think we voted on this a while ago: the 2.1 core and most blocks must work with 1.3, but some blocks might not. So it's not a surprise. If we want to make sure 2.1 compiles with JDK 1.3 as shipped, we could add a notice to the release instructions, that this must be tested before releasing - it's only a matter of disabling blocks which do not compile with 1.3. For 2.2, it would be cool to have this info in the blocks themselves - do the Maven POMs allow for some "JDK requirements" metadata? -Bertrand