Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65550 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2006 14:53:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2006 14:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45349 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2006 14:53:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 45296 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2006 14:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 45281 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2006 14:53:46 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:53:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received: from [213.193.229.171] ([213.193.229.171:55227] helo=cas.priorweb.be) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 24/48-24842-7F48E154 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:53:45 -0700 Received: (qmail 24519 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Sep 2006 14:53:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cas.priorweb.be) (127.0.0.1) by cas.priorweb.be with SMTP; 30 Sep 2006 14:53:51 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (d51A4CE9D.access.telenet.be [81.164.206.157]) by cas.priorweb.be (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060930130324.GA8228@palombe.anyware> References: <451E420D.6050500@apache.org> <451E45B4.7030407@apache.org> <451A567A.4@gmail.com> <451A7817.8020003@apache.org> <20060927135135.GA55588@vision.anyware> <451BB815.2090905@nada.kth.se> <451BBBBB.30307@apache.org> <451BC626.7080301@apache.org> <20060929224641.GB9335@palombe.anyware> <451E420D.6050500@apache.org> <20060930130324.GA8228@palombe.anyware> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jorg Heymans Subject: Re: BUILD SUCCESSFUL (Was: Maven info wanted) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:53:41 +0200 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Passed X-Spam-Scanned: 0.0 X-Spam-Status: NO X-Scanned-By: PriorWeb mailfilter X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 30 Sep 2006, at 15:03, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > > Did you turn on Maven's offline mode? In my experience the > offline mode is not reliable, you often have to switch back > online, and then you don't have the same build duration! It's > something I can't bear with Maven 2: why bother doing HTTP > requests as the jar is already fetched?! Does this really matter? How often during development of a typical webapplication do you invoke your build system? I don't know about you but for me, using maven in a project does not mean i type "mvn clean install" from the project root every 2 minutes. I'll invoke it to regenerate the eclipse project files, i'll invoke it each time i need to deliver a new EAR for testing and a few times in between to regenerate hibernate descriptors through xdoclet. That's *it*, everything else is pretty much IDE driven. So frankly if you're suggesting me an alternative build system that does less http requests, has better logging output or compiles my code 50% faster then i can't honestly say i'm interested as it's not at all what having a standardized build system is all about. Regards, Jorg