Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22687 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2006 13:46:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 13:46:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 35954 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2006 13:46:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 35875 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2006 13:46:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 35625 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2006 13:46:34 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:46:34 -0700 Message-ID: <451D2461.1010400@apache.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:49:21 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Maven dictatorship and software parasitism (was Re: Maven info wanted) References: <451A567A.4@gmail.com> <451A7817.8020003@apache.org> <20060927135135.GA55588@vision.anyware> <451BB815.2090905@nada.kth.se> <451BBBBB.30307@apache.org> <451BC626.7080301@apache.org> <451BEFD1.3060409@apache.org> <451C08FB.1030800@apache.org> <451CED0F.40902@apache.org> <451CF194.9090604@apache.org> <451D1A32.8000706@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <451D1A32.8000706@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Well, I will continue being the bad guy today... > > This is actually one of the areas where there are some similarities > between Cocoon and Maven. Its developers know it by heart and know how > to use it, what to use and what not to use. And they not always > understand that people not actively developing the project aren't > comfortable with its magic. > > Note that I'm not pointing fingers to anybody here, being myself a > developer for Cocoon, but realizing this matter of fact by trying to be > a Maven user! > And we actually experienced the aposite - the people doing the Cocoon based projects had no knowledge of maven and where the average Cocoon user! And they were quiet happy as some of them knew the pain of building a cocoon based application using 2.1.x. And it is interesting to see that people like e.g. RoR because of the convention over configuration pattern while they seem to hate such things in Java-land and call it "too much magic". :) Seriously, I see your points - we all struggled with using Maven and had severe problems in the past months; but if you use it today, there is no real magic just convention and it works. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/