Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <451D1AE5.1080805@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:08:53 +0200
From: Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: versions in poms
References: <451D1908.9000400@reverycodes.com>
In-Reply-To: <451D1908.9000400@reverycodes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> To maven gurus here:
> 
> I see many a poms have a version inside, like "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT", or 
> "1.0.0-M2-SNAPSHOT".
> 
> Am I right in understanding that this is either an error or omission, 
> and versions everywhere should read "2.2.0-SNAPSHOT" or 
> "2.2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT"?

no, we decided (at least by not questioning it so far) that only the Cocoon core 
module will get the version 2.2.0. As we have never released any block as a 
seperate artifact yet, it makes sense to use 1.0.0 as version. It also indicates 
that we can finally(!) have separate release cycles for our various artifacts.

-- 
Reinhard P�tz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------

	

	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Der fr�he Vogel f�ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de