Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of agallardo@agssa.net designates
 165.98.167.227 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (ags01.agssa.net: 10.0.0.7 is whitelisted)
 receiver=ags01.agssa.net; client-ip=10.0.0.7; helo=[10.0.0.7];
 envelope-from=agallardo@agssa.net;
 x-software=spfmilter 0.97 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with
 libspf2-1.0.0;
Message-ID: <44DCBA69.9070106@agssa.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:12:09 -0500
From: Antonio Gallardo <agallardo@agssa.net>
Organization: AG Software, S. A.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Java 5 as minimum JDK requirement
References: <44D88E48.7000601@apache.org> <ebaf66$sqi$1@sea.gmane.org>
 <44D8E572.2060201@gmx.de> <44DAFF56.104@nada.kth.se>
 <ebi7gq$2d5$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <ebi7gq$2d5$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Jorg Heymans escribi�:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>   
>>>> -0, because this means eliminating cocoon 2.2 on "older" application
>>>> servers eg weblogic 8.1.
>>>>         
>> IIUC weblogic 8.1 uses servlet 2.3 so I guess you need to veto the use
>> of servlet 2.4 to make this a valid point.
>>
>>     
>
> I felt that my current involvement in cocoon is not big enough to
> warrant a veto, hence the -0 here. WLS 8.1 was just an example from my
> past experience, but technically you're right ofcourse.
>   
Jorg,

you (as any other pmc member) have the right to veto. Please keep in 
mind that everybody collaborate as much as he can. Feedback providing is 
a fact that you care about this project. :-)

We should not accept you vote change due this reason, because it seems 
to be more an emotional reason than a technical reason.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.