Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of agallardo@agssa.net designates
 165.98.167.227 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (ags01.agssa.net: 10.0.0.7 is whitelisted)
 receiver=ags01.agssa.net; client-ip=10.0.0.7; helo=[10.0.0.7];
 envelope-from=agallardo@agssa.net;
 x-software=spfmilter 0.97 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with
 libspf2-1.0.0;
Message-ID: <44DAC9A4.8060606@agssa.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:52:36 -0500
From: Antonio Gallardo <agallardo@agssa.net>
Organization: AG Software, S. A.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: cforms incompatibility in 2.1.9 (was [Fwd: [jira] Reopened:
 (COCOON-1687)
 [PATCH] JXPATHBinding : when saving the form, remove xml elements if the
 value of the widget is null])
References: <44D8471B.6090007@outerthought.org>
 <20060808102220.GC55043@vision.anyware> <44D871BB.9080603@outerthought.org>
 <20060808132559.GB18285@vision.anyware> <44D9E254.6000109@outerthought.org>
 <20060809133301.GI2151@vision.anyware> <44D9F1F3.4000800@outerthought.org>
 <20060809150104.GJ2151@vision.anyware> <44DA0EA0.2010308@outerthought.org>
 <20060809164237.GM2151@vision.anyware>
In-Reply-To: <20060809164237.GM2151@vision.anyware>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Jean-Baptiste Quenot escribi�:
> * Marc Portier:
>
>   
>> Anyways, this whole process of finding  out what and how kind of
>> convinced me that we can in fact revert the change. (and not add
>> an attribute)
>>     
>
> That is  the simple way.   But ending up  with empty tags  for all
> widgets  having the  null  value is  not  satisfactory.  And  this
> also  means  that every  convertor  must  check null  *and*  empty
> string.  This  also means  that if  you turn  off leniency  in the
> FormattingDateConvertor  with  lenient="false"  attribute,  you're
> SOL.
>
> Anyway, let's close the discussion... I won't take the time to add
> the knob because I don't use this binding API anymore.  If someone
> shows interest we can always add it later.
>   
Would you provide a final decision as a issue comment? I should help the 
next person trying to fix the issue.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.