Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40262 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 10:44:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 10:44:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 80455 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 10:44:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 80385 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 10:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 80374 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 10:44:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:44:39 -0700 Message-ID: <44D86B41.80503@apache.org> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:45:21 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Cocoon 2.2 and Java 5 References: <44D82426.8050802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <44D82426.8050802@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Reinhard Poetz wrote: > What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2 years > ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk? +1 (but we should not start refactor all the code *now* to Java 5) What about moving to servlet 2.4 as well? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/