cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r437365 - in /cocoon/trunk/core/cocoon-core/src/main: java/org/apache/cocoon/components/treeprocessor/sitemap/ java/org/apache/cocoon/core/container/spring/ resources/org/apache/cocoon/core/container/spring/
Date Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:27:12 GMT
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better if instead of processorClassName it was a bean 
> reference? There is no way to do any configuration if only class name is 
> passed.
> 
Yes, a bean would be better, but I'm not sure if this works. I will try
this out during the week and then change the code.

> I am still pushing for the ability to test developments blocks in 
> isolation which would require something like:
> 
> <cocoon:properties additionalProcessor="localProcessor"/>
> 
> <bean id="localProcessor" class="sth">
> 	<property name="propertyPath"
>            value="src/main/resources/META-INF/properties"/>
> </bean>
> 
We already have an interface for this:
org.apache.cocoon.configuration.PropertyProvider.

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Mime
View raw message