Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54677 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2006 08:48:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2006 08:48:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 95205 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 08:48:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 95125 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 08:48:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 95114 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2006 08:48:03 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:48:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of hedhman@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.199] (HELO wx-out-0102.google.com) (66.249.82.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:48:02 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id h27so775756wxd for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=eCxKDy556ema+HCX1IRiB6PLP0ZhQzRN7ucbN1rZBltgYTTMpUhRshLcKaWsZdT/6xSZuvGGn3FOve+/6HjXSEOPRa9didOh2riYX4azu5BYldJhfwE2/Q1HgEnuJP8WXqohMtaa5j7YV22tP669OQaKvNbujnYYkq7SpmUDL6Y= Received: by 10.70.31.9 with SMTP id e9mr8134440wxe; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clt-5-188.netcompartner.com ( [218.208.246.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i37sm4930913wxd.2006.06.19.01.47.40; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:47:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Niclas Hedhman To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [2.2] Release? Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:47:36 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <448E501B.80701@apache.org> <44953E00.9080604@apache.org> <449646C2.1020707@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <449646C2.1020707@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606191647.37061.niclas@hedhman.org> Sender: Niclas Hedhman X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Monday 19 June 2006 14:40, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> Regardless of the name, I think we should take a little bit more time > >> and use the ApacheCon hackathon to "prepare" this first release and then > >> release (or upload) right after the ApacheCon. > > > > Then let's release in the first week of July *whatever* we have by then. > > This should also be the starting signal for a time-based release cycle > > (see my other answer to this mail). > > > :) Sorry to be a little pita here, but I will vote against a release in > > the first week of July *if* the situation with the samples is still the > same. If this is fixed by then I'll be fine :) Could the compromise be that the 'release' == 'alpha/beta/grokmake' with the README listing '* Examples a,b,c not working,' ?? Striving for perfection before action, is a paradox as perfection can only be obtained by fine-tuning the action. I would +1 a improved release every week. Small steps. Little to consider. Fast Forward. Done, Next!, Done! ... Anybody still around from the Cocoon 1.0 times ?? Cheers Niclas