cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <>
Subject Re: [2.2] Release?
Date Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:46:47 GMT
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:29:41 +0200
> From: Reinhard Poetz <>
> Reply-To:
> To:
> Subject: Re: [2.2] Release?
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>  So this means we release some jars and the plugins? I think one
>>  important goal of this
>>  release should be to get feedback, so we should try to make the barrier
>>  to test 2.2 as low as possible while puttint as less effort as possible
>>  into it. I'm not sure if just releasing maven artifacts is enough here.
> Which kind of feedback do you want?
> I think we need feedback from people that migrate their projects to C22. I 
> don't believe it makes sense to use C22 without a Maven 2 based build. And, 
> as I said in many previous mails, a distribution that can be compared to a 
> C21 release has its only purpose in being a demo application, nothing more.
> So yes, I think that the named artifacts are enough for a first release. 
> Releasing forms, fop, javaflow, apples, batik, mail and portal should be the 
> next step so that more people can start to experiment with a migration. 
> During this phase we should fix their samples too.

And don't forget the archetypes and plugins.

> Finally, we don't have to provide *one* release that contains all our 50+ 
> blocks anymore. Luckily we can release iterativly whenever something is ready 
> :-)

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland -
Orixo, the XML business alliance -
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)


View raw message