cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [2.2] Release?
Date Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:46:47 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:29:41 +0200
> From: Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [2.2] Release?
> 
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>>  So this means we release some jars and the plugins? I think one
>>  important goal of this
>>  release should be to get feedback, so we should try to make the barrier
>>  to test 2.2 as low as possible while puttint as less effort as possible
>>  into it. I'm not sure if just releasing maven artifacts is enough here.
>
> Which kind of feedback do you want?
> I think we need feedback from people that migrate their projects to C22. I 
> don't believe it makes sense to use C22 without a Maven 2 based build. And, 
> as I said in many previous mails, a distribution that can be compared to a 
> C21 release has its only purpose in being a demo application, nothing more.
>
> So yes, I think that the named artifacts are enough for a first release. 
> Releasing forms, fop, javaflow, apples, batik, mail and portal should be the 
> next step so that more people can start to experiment with a migration. 
> During this phase we should fix their samples too.

And don't forget the archetypes and plugins.

>
> Finally, we don't have to provide *one* release that contains all our 50+ 
> blocks anymore. Luckily we can release iterativly whenever something is ready 
> :-)
>
>

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEkAU5LNdJvZjjVZARArn7AJ4oynf6LGHUCpTTW1oNlxHsqIEc+QCdHHeB
7c7jbp8hLM782mo0jpowRd8=
=kjmi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message