From dev-return-86896-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Fri May 05 18:05:09 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83358 invoked from network); 5 May 2006 18:05:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2006 18:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 28787 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2006 18:05:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 28693 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2006 18:05:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 28682 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2006 18:05:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:05:02 -0700 Message-ID: <445B93F2.2090007@apache.org> Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 20:05:38 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Giving a try to Cocoon 2.2 References: <20060419163053.GK35777@vision.anyware> <445B5676.4060906@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <445B5676.4060906@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > >> 9) forms samples are showing, but none of the samples is actually >> working, see cocoon22-stacktrace-callfunction and >> cocoon22-stacktrace-call attached > > I can confirm this. I guess it is related to the introduction of Spring. > Carsten, any ideas? > Don't know - after I finished the Spring stuff some weeks ago, my tests showed that all *should* work, including sub sitemaps and so on. So this might be due to the move to Spring, might be a mistake in the configuration or maybe introduced later by some refactoring. I have currently no time to investigate further, but can do this eventually in about three weeks. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/