cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maven dependencies
Date Thu, 11 May 2006 08:36:04 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Jorg Heymans wrote:

> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:13:48 +0200
> From: Jorg Heymans <jh@domek.be>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maven dependencies
> 
>
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
>> I've run a little script agains the code base. We already have
>> dependencies of the same artifact with different versions:
>>
>> POM: ./blocks/cocoon-portal/cocoon-portal-impl/pom.xml
>>         group=castor    artifact=castor version=0.9.6
>> POM: ./blocks/cocoon-scratchpad/cocoon-scratchpad-impl/pom.xml
>>         group=castor    artifact=castor version=0.9.7
>> POM: ./blocks/cocoon-chaperon/cocoon-chaperon-impl/pom.xml
>>         group=castor    artifact=castor version=0.9.7
>> POM: ./tools/cocoon-block-deployer/cocoon-deployer-core/pom.xml
>>         group=castor    artifact=castor version=1.0M1
>>
>> POM: ./core/cocoon-blocks-fw/cocoon-blocks-fw-demo2/pom.xml
>>         group=org.apache.cocoon artifact=cocoon-blocks-fw-impl
>> version=1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>> POM: ./core/cocoon-blocks-fw/cocoon-blocks-fw-servlet-impl/pom.xml
>>         group=org.apache.cocoon artifact=cocoon-blocks-fw-impl
>> version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> POM: ./core/cocoon-core/pom.xml
>>         group=org.apache.excalibur.components.sourceresolve
>> artifact=excalibur-sourceresolve        version=2.1
>> POM: ./blocks/cocoon-scratchpad/cocoon-scratchpad-impl/pom.xml
>>         group=excalibur-sourceresolve
>> artifact=excalibur-sourceresolve        version=2.1
>>
>> POM: ./tools/cocoon-block-deployer/cocoon-deployer-core/pom.xml
>>         group=oro       artifact=oro    version=2.0.7
>> POM: ./blocks/cocoon-forms/cocoon-forms-impl/pom.xml
>>         group=oro       artifact=oro    version=2.0.8
>>
>
> Thanks, that output is very useful. I'll go and fix these right away.
>
> It would be great if you could run that script every now and then so we
>  can keep the dependency beast tamed.

I think it's better I put it into thetools section of our trunk so that 
anybody can check from time to time.

>
>> What should we do with those?
>
> Fail early i'ld say, we upgrade all of them to the highest version
> currently used and see how it goes.
>
> ----
>
> Antonio's concern about the osgi block isolation is valid, but IMO it
> does not apply as long as we haven't got it fully working. Consequently
> there is no reason trying to accomodate for it now.

Exactly,that's why I've written that script ;-)

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEYvd1LNdJvZjjVZARAsX8AKCKsNvOaqjJdNFCk0wUq3H09m5TMQCgr568
oYSOPiiruCXco5vS1EUnWHM=
=EN0K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message