Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Message-ID: <441818CB.4040105@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:38:19 +0100
From: Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] OSGi based blocks
References: <44173F14.4030701@nada.kth.se> <44180927.80809@odoko.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <44180927.80809@odoko.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Upayavira wrote:
> My own reflections on this is whether or not this is still Cocoon.
> 
> It seems to me that you are creating a framework for managing web
> applications based upon servlets, OSGi and the URLConnections. This
> doesn't seem all that specific to Cocoon - it seems more general than
> that, and potentially more generally useful too.
> 
> Cocoon's contribution would be its SitemapServlet, and other such elements.
> 
> So, my question: Is this still cocoon, or is it becoming something more
> general than that (e.g. that could become a Felix sub-project) - thus
> gaining a far wider adoption?

That's maybe right but don't let us do the mistake of externalizing things ATM.
We should develop it under our project for now and when we know more about all 
the consequences we can still move it to another community or start to build a 
new one so that other projects that don't need this Cocoon-thing can reuse it ;-)

-- 
Reinhard P�tz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------

	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de