Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25512 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2006 10:05:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2006 10:05:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 62865 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2006 10:05:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 62801 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2006 10:05:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 62790 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2006 10:05:35 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:05:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of hepabolu@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.196] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:05:34 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so1327344nzh for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:05:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DvCqTQfX0N0JseqgPOha73TtDdmyh8UglJt/Bw9p+za9W8mLALZ8lUUch++zhBFusrbMXVSuJPxK3GPlAIEVCzMFn7I1wGhvfsK5usg0tU2lARyilESNS5viKaWenQFc1qxLk8OriUUGFgR1njwUOWf83qux7h141c8p/8FoTfw= Received: by 10.64.179.20 with SMTP id b20mr1926683qbf; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?137.120.15.239? ( [137.120.15.239]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e15sm22452qba.2006.03.13.02.04.40; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:04:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <441543C3.3010209@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:04:51 +0100 From: hepabolu Reply-To: hepabolu@gmail.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Release 2.1.9 (again) [Dojo] References: <44103D4F.4050001@dslextreme.com> <94611F9D-71FA-4239-AD62-66D026722FA5@apache.org> <441185D0.4070003@dslextreme.com> <44119364.9000500@apache.org> <44129F5A.9090405@gmx.de> <44131597.900@apache.org> <44153FCE.3000205@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <44153FCE.3000205@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez said the following on 13-03-2006 10:47: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Anyways, given my current time constraints I can do the release not any >> sooner than the 31st of March - so, seeing this as a positive fact, we >> have a little more time to test everything :). I would call for a code >> freeze on the 24th of March then. >> > > +1. Dojo code is committed, and I'd like people to try the new forms > samples. Great! Thanks! Haven't looked thoroughly at the code yet, but I'm wondering two things: 1. several special attributes (ajax=true and some Dojo required attributes) make it impossible to produce valid XHTML pages. A quick reading in some Dojo files showed that most dojo attributes can be replaced with classnames or identifiers, making valid XHTML pages still possible. Have you used any of those? Or are there other ways to produce valid XHTML pages that can already be incorporated in the current code? 2. Dojo contains a (rich text) editor, much along the lines of htmlarea. Have you compared the two and would it be possible to replace htmlarea with the Dojo version or are there features we would miss? In the latter case: if we stick with htmlarea, is it worthwhile to update to Xinha since that is a more active project around htmlarea? Once again thanks for the work. Bye, Helma