cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Poetz <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] OSGi based blocks
Date Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:28:37 GMT
Upayavira wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> 
>>Le 15 mars 06 à 16:04, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>...I personally would love to have the new configuration features of
>>>2.2 in
>>>2.1.x,
>>>like the includes for xconf and properties. This alone is a big step
>>>forward. Unfortunately this is tight to many other changes like the
>>>Spring based container (which I also would like to have *today*).
>>>
>>>So perhaps your suggestion, starting anew with 2.1.x as trunk is a good
>>>way to move on...
>>
>>How about backporting the Spring-based container and the new
>>configuration features to 2.1.x, and make that Cocoon 2.3, without
>>touching the current trunk?
>>
>>The current 2.2 would then stay as is, people could work on it until it
>>stabilizes, and when it's time to release it we can always call it 3.0
>>or whatever to avoid confusion.
>>
>>And that 2.3 release would be a big improvement already, especially
>>using Spring as its container.
> 
> 
> Exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about. Both streams keep innovating.

I have no problem with a backport in general, but why exactly *now* when Daniel 
writes a mail that he has solved all problems that required a lot of research 
work and Daniel and I only need some more weeks of "implementation work"?

-- 
Reinhard Pötz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------

	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

Mime
View raw message