Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32344 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2006 13:13:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2006 13:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 27671 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 13:13:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 27586 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 13:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 27567 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2006 13:13:30 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:13:30 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [68.230.240.33] (HELO eastrmmtao06.cox.net) (68.230.240.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:13:29 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.101] (really [70.179.64.83]) by eastrmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060222131301.CPMA9108.eastrmmtao06.cox.net@[192.168.0.101]> for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:13:01 -0500 Message-ID: <43FC635F.4080109@reverycodes.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:13:03 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.1.9 References: <43FA3070.90400@dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <43FA3070.90400@dslextreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ralph Goers wrote: > The forms block is now marked stable. I believe legal has given the OK > for us to use the JCR api. To the best of my recollection I believe > those were the only two items standing in the way of a 2.1.9 release. > So please vote. +1 Vadim