Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <43E90D7E.6090302@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:13:34 +0100
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] Using Spring instead of ECM++
References: <43E8F7FF.4070304@apache.org>
 <24CE2086-2764-41EA-BF1B-7C609B3A37A3@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <24CE2086-2764-41EA-BF1B-7C609B3A37A3@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ugo Cei wrote:
> Il giorno 07/feb/06, alle ore 20:41, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
> 
>> What about replacing ECM++ with Spring?
> 
> I don't think I have to tell you how much I would love that. However,  
> I'm a bit confused, but it's really my fault, as I haven't been  
> following at all the recent realblocks/osgi/2.2 talk and  
> developments. Is this for 2.1, 2.2, 3.0? How does it relate to OSGi  
> and "Real Blocks" (TM)?
> 
I would like to do this for 2.2. I actually don't know how this relates to
real blocks and all this stuff as I currently have no idea how that will
work. So for me this is just a replacement for our ECM++.

Carsten


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/