cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Logkit (I know, again) was [RT] Using Spring instead of ECM++
Date Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:15:06 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ralph Goers wrote:

> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:07:58 -0800
> From: Ralph Goers <Ralph.Goers@dslextreme.com>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org, rgoers@apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Logkit (I know, again) was [RT] Using Spring instead of ECM++
> 
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>>
>>  While we are at discussing cleanups.
>>
>>  What about also getting rid of logkit and use what we already have in our
>>  dependency lists (log4J, commons-logging, ...)?
>>
>>  I think we definitively need to get a smaller footprint and also get
>>  committed to fewer alternatives (of which we do have too many now IMHO,
>>  not mentioning other stuff we carry with us just because we do have them
>>  since years). 
> I thought we already discussed this and made log4j the default?  If that is 
> the proposal, I'm fine with it.  If the proposal means getting rid of our 
> Logger abstraction layer I'm -1 on that.

If the logger abstraction you mentioned is the Avalon LogEnabled one 
than yes, we will still have to support that for backward compatability.

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD8KJ6LNdJvZjjVZARAulkAJ0Td8xAWkSHgVvdBrS+QbiLy8RbuQCfdrV4
SRnldYHsPL4ohOutML/9h2k=
=zl97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message