cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leszek Gawron <lgaw...@mobilebox.pl>
Subject Re: [RT] Using Spring instead of ECM++
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:44:21 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> What about replacing ECM++ with Spring? I've a prototype on my harddisk
> which sets up a Spring BeanFactory based on our current Avalon
> configuration files (roles and xconf with includes and property
> replacements). This makes all of our components real spring beans while
> allowing a smooth migration path.
> The benefit of this is that you can simply use Spring without any
> bridging stuff or tricks. And your Spring beans can depend on the Avalon
> components (and vice versa) without any problems (as there are only
> Spring beans). And the container is then final no longer our business,
> we just use the most used/known one.
> The prototype supports all Avalon lifecycle interfaces right now - with
> the exception of Poolable/Recyclable as Spring does not have a way to
> release a bean. We could use our Proxy based approach for thread safe
> poolables for compatibility while trying to bann all poolable components
> anyway.
> 
> So what do people think?
I haven't read any other replies yet but my small brain tells me to be 
+100 on this one. I already am in uncomfortable situation of configuring 
my own spring xml parser just because I cannot use cocoon's one in spring.

-- 
Leszek Gawron                                      lgawron@mobilebox.pl
IT Manager                                         MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67                              http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812                       fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65

Mime
View raw message