cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ralph Goers" <>
Subject Re: Logkit (I know, again) was [RT] Using Spring instead of ECM++
Date Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:43:14 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler said:
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>> If the logger abstraction you mentioned is the Avalon LogEnabled one
>> than yes, we will still have to support that for backward compatability.
> Of course we will support LogEnabled - with the only difference that you
> always get a wrapper around a Log4J (or whatever we decide) logger.

What do you mean by "always"?  I thought that we switched the default from
logkit to log4j a while ago?  What more is needed?


View raw message