Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.nuescheler@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.204 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=CDDhee5d/IwyXeaFLT4XjK9LoCtiBYlXkPWV49TNKGcYoL/5mtEIfhGgoi5ATFqdmwHtbTEfXym3zYDdSsfTicNfozoPHzHEIPiWEhDD8yvdFjYfat1Jlqa6TR6kcI9+bL1cUQOeuPk22bLWXOf/82OPROC7jgqQ7O5AZrrr76w=
Message-ID: <eb7e2190601120042q3b8df97ch4f87ed78d9ba4fec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:42:04 +0100
From: David Nuescheler <david.nuescheler@gmail.com>
Reply-To: david.nuescheler@day.com
To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [M10N] cocoon-jcr
Cc: dev@cocoon.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <43C60E25.4030103@day.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601111314260.29368@lapgp.otego.com>
	 <43C53DFF.5080101@apache.org> <43C60E25.4030103@day.com>

Hi,

> >> Anybody knows of one? I've found a jcr-1.0.jar at
> >> http://www.day.com/maven/jsr170/jars/ but I don't want to list the
> >> Day server in our poms.

As far as I am concerned, I would argue that based on the JCP licensing
the "Spec-Lead" of a JSR as the owner of the intellectual property is proba=
bly
the most legitimate source to distribute the resulting JAR-File of an API.
Thoughts?

regards,
david