Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13831 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 10:25:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 10:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 1237 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2006 10:24:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 1089 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2006 10:24:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 938 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2006 10:24:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:24:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [195.216.81.147] (HELO mail.otego.com) (195.216.81.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:24:57 -0800 Received: (qmail 30272 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 11:24:34 +0100 Received: from 192.168.222.3 by zeus (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1162. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(192.168.222.3):. Processed in 0.036461 secs); 11 Jan 2006 10:24:34 -0000 Received: from zeus2.otego.com (HELO localhost) (192.168.222.3) by zeus2.otego.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 11:24:34 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:24:27 +0100 (CET) From: Giacomo Pati Sender: giacomo@lapgp.otego.com To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367714 - in /cocoon/trunk/cocoon-template: ./ pom.xml src/ src/main/ src/test/ In-Reply-To: <43C4DB60.6080507@apache.org> Message-ID: References: <20060110182806.13287.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <43C40D0A.4090003@mobilebox.pl> <43C4151D.2010300@nada.kth.se> <43C41879.1090308@apache.org> <43C4D657.1040308@nada.kth.se> <43C4DB60.6080507@apache.org> X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: 9E66 40E0 0A9C B37F E29E 5816 2CD7 49BD 98E3 5590 X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://pks.gpg.cz:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2CD749BD98E35590 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:18:08 +0100 > From: Carsten Ziegeler > Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r367714 - in /cocoon/trunk/cocoon-template: ./ > pom.xml src/ src/main/ src/test/ > > Daniel Fagerstrom schrieb: >> Jorg Heymans skrev: >> >>> Giacomo Pati wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> Each block should have the same groupId yes. Should we make it >>> o.a.c.blocks ? (in analogy with [1]) >> >> >> Everything will be a block, the core included, in analogy with [2]. So >> it would be redundant to introduce an extra level in the groupId. >> > Hmm, don't we need some "bootstrapping", for example the cocoon servlet > or the cli main class etc? I think these are not really blocks. Even if > they are from an implementation pov, they are not from a functionality > pov. So personally, I would distinguish between blocks and > "bootstrapping" which could be core. Should this distinction be on the groupId? Isn't the groupId just saying that all stuff in it belongs to the same project? - -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDxNzjLNdJvZjjVZARAu59AJsFb2e/fmbg+/AuTfuAMyVq7+VF3ACg6v8V GNg4i4QG4i+kTFMUofIH5Ik= =G6Eq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----