Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-84035-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65838 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2006 11:16:37 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2006 11:16:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 72460 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2006 11:15:25 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72193 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2006 11:15:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72162 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2006 11:15:21 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:15:19 -0800
Message-ID: <43D4BB5F.4060202@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:17:51 +0100
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: setup() called twice in one request
References: <200601191901.58102.rassy@math.tu-berlin.de>
 <200601201413.01962.rassy@math.tu-berlin.de> <43D495F2.2080401@apache.org>
 <200601231151.31529.rassy@math.tu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <200601231151.31529.rassy@math.tu-berlin.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Tilman Rassy schrieb:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 09:38, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Tilman Rassy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:43, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>>>> On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
>>>>> we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is sometimes
>>>>> called twice in one request.
>>>> Are you sure that it is only one request. For example using the Acrobat
>>>> Reader in IE results in two requests.
>>> I'm quite sure that it is the same request and the the same generator
>>> instance - we have very detailed logging. Here is an exceprt from the
>>> logs:
>>>
>>> ------------ log except start -----------
>>>
>>> <SNIP/>
>> Strange, what about the generate() method? When is that one called?
>> Twice as well?
> 
> In the case of the request with the two setup() calls, it is not called at 
> all. Probably the response is taken from the cache. In other cases, when it 
> is called, it is called only once.
> 
> One thing I should mention is that in all cases the response is not corrupted. 
> What we see in the browser is exactly what we expect.
> 
>> Now, the best thing would be if you could provide a reproducable test
>> case for us.
> 
> Yes, I will try to create one. However, since our system contains a lot of 
> code and data, it may take a little time to extract a testcase from it.
> 
Sure :)

Can you provide a stack trace for the two calls of the setup() method,
so we can see from where this method is called.

Thanks
Carsten



-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/