Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:43:52 +1100
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [2.2] Remove documentation
Message-ID: <20060109224352.GA26110@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
References: <43C1453F.1010101@apache.org> <43C2059E.5050208@apache.org>
 <43C21E66.1000800@apache.org> <43C2E03D.905@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43C2E03D.905@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

hepabolu wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> 
> >>I think they are not needed any more. These files were added before we 
> >>switched to Daisy CMS.
> >>
> >Yes, that's what I thought as well. Now if noone complains today, I'll
> >remove them later during the week.
> 
> I never got round to checking them against the versions in Daisy, so if 
> you are absolutely sure that there haven't been any changes/additions to 
> these docs that are not in Daisy, go ahead and clean them. If not, move 
> them to a separate place and I'll check them out later. I'd be very 
> happy if you could remove the sections that are not changed. Saves time.

I reckon that there will be differences. It was/is
difficult to manually keep changes synchronised between
branches.

Anyway, Carsten would add a Tag to trunk before removing them.
Then it would be easy to get an svn checkout that still
contained the docs.

-David